CCAC species-specific recommendations on:
BATS

For the PDF version of this document, click
here .
These species specific recommendations are intended to provide
best practices for field studies, including short-term housing.
For the long-term housing of bats, Chapter VII of the CCAC
Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals, Volume
2 (1984) remains relevant and should be consulted in addition
to current literature on the particular species to be maintained
in captivity.
1. General Considerations
There are about 1,000 different species of bats in the world, ranging in size from 2 grams to 1,500 grams. While some species use echolocation, others do not. Bats play a number of trophic roles; some species
eat animals (usually insects), others fruit and leaves, nectar
and pollen, and still others blood. While some bats are homeothermic,
others are heterothermic. The combinations of size, feeding
behaviour, thermoregulation strategy and use of echolocation
makes it vital to know as much as possible about a study species
before embarking on research with these animals. Some species
are at risk and should be the subjects of research only after
careful deliberation (Hutson et al., 2001).
Hibernating bats are sensitive to the presence of humans and
respond by an increase in activity (Thomas, 1995). Visits
to sites where bats hibernate should therefore be minimized.
In Myotis lucifugus, one arousal from hibernation (for example,
in response to disturbance) costs the bat the same amount
of energy that it would use during 60 days of hibernation
(Thomas, 1995).
Female bats often aggregate in maternity colonies, places
where young are born and raised. In these areas, bats are
extremely sensitive to disturbance which can lead to young
being dropped by their mothers or the bats being forced to
move to an alternate (perhaps inferior) site.
2. Killed Specimens
Where samples from previously killed specimens are used, investigators
are not required to submit a formal protocol to an animal
care committee (ACC). However, the ACC should be informed
of the study so that the potential for disease transmission,
etc. is understood. In addition, investigators should be aware
that, even for previously killed organisms, many journals
will not accept papers unless the study has been subject to
ethical review by an ACC.
3. Live Capture
Bats are sensitive to thermal changes and dehydration, and
minimal handling is recommended to limit the period of stress.
Individuals should not be taken from maternity colonies during
the parturition and lactation period unless necessary to accomplish
the goals of the study.
Mist nets, hand/hoop nets and harp traps, when properly used,
are humane methods for the capture of bats (Tuttle, 1974;
Kunz & Kurta, 1988). Mist nets need to be monitored regularly
and captured bats removed immediately to avoid injuries caused
by net entanglement or predators. Care must be taken when
removing bats from mist nets, and special attention paid to
the removal of their wings. Since bats fly into nets with
their wings spread and fold them after capture, successful
removal of a bat from a mist net often means spreading its
wings. Allowing the bat to bite something, such as a cloth
bag or loose part of a glove, may help prevent it from chewing
the net while being removed (Kunz & Kurta, 1988). As a
precaution, investigators should carry small scissors for
cutting the net in cases where a bat has become severely entangled.
Harp traps, instead of mist nets, should be used where large
numbers of bats need to be captured. Harp traps do not need
to be tended as frequently as mist nets; however, one must
be aware of the possibility of predators entering the trap
bag, as well as the potential negative consequences of keeping
several bats in the same bag (e.g., biting, predation, and
rabies transfer) (Kunz & Kurta, 1988). Many designs of
harp traps only provide limited protection from the weather.
Heavy rain or other adverse weather could result in bats becoming
wet, affecting their thermoregulation and hence their energetic
balance. Also, if bats are trapped in the morning, they need
to be protected from the sun. Harp traps must be checked with
sufficient frequency so that feeding patterns are not severely
interrupted. In many areas, bats are most active shortly after
dusk, so checking should be more frequent during this period.
Roosting bats can be successfully captured by hand. When extracting
bats from roosting sites, investigators must be careful not
to damage the delicate wing bones and membranes (Kunz &
Kurta, 1988). Hand nets are also used, but should not be employed
unless the user is very adept. Investigators must exercise
particular caution so as not to injure the bats, as the risk
of wing injury is high (Kunz & Kurta, 1988). In many cases,
the combined speed of the bat and the net are sufficient to
stress or break fragile finger bones. It is best to bring
the net up from behind the flying animal as opposed to scooping
at it head on.
4. Physical Restraint and Handling
Captured bats bite in self-defense. The great variation in
the size of bats means that while some species can deliver
painful bites, others rarely break the skin. People handling
bats or removing them from nets should consider wearing gloves
of appropriate weight to reduce the risk of bites. Some bat
biologists wear one glove when removing bats from a mist net,
using the gloved hand to secure the bat and the bare hand
to disentangle it from the net. If gloves are used, however,
they must be thin (e.g., golf gloves or thin synthetic diving
gloves) so that the handling of bats is not made more difficult
and the bats are not subjected to an increased risk of injury.
Additionally, due to the difficulty of handling bats properly,
an individual knowledgeable about appropriate techniques should
be present.
5. Chemical Restraint and Anesthesia
The use of chemical restraint is recommended whenever a procedure
will cause undue stress or pain to a bat. Isoflurane and sevoflurane
are the anesthetics of choice. The use of halothane or methoxyflurane
are not recommended because induction time is prolonged, and
these anesthetics are stored in body fat for long periods
of time (Kemmerer, in preparation).
6. Banding and Tagging
Bats should only be banded if necessary to the goals of the
study, as the stress of handling can affect the animals’
well-being. Furthermore, all bands are injurious to bats to
varying degrees, and the bats have been known to obliterate
the identifying numbers by chewing on the bands (Barnard,
1989). Banding is not appropriate for all species of bats.
Adverse problems have been found for some species, including
infections in the membranes around the band, which could in
some cases affect survival. Investigators should check the
literature to ensure that the marking technique is acceptable
for their species and their research question.
Any detrimental effects of banding on bats will be greatest
during times when their energy levels are most critical (e.g.,
during hibernation or when females are caring for young) (Barclay
& Bell, 1988), and thus banding should be avoided during
these times. Additionally, it is recommended that the capture
of bats for marking take place away from their roosts, as
bats may permanently abandon sites where they have been captured
(Barclay & Bell, 1988).
Bands, whether aluminum or plastic, are an acceptable means
for permanently marking bats, if applied correctly. Aluminum
bands should have a recurved opening, if possible, to avoid
chafing on the membrane. For small insectivorous bats, or
those with narrow antebrachial membranes, bands can be placed
over the forearm with the opening facing posteriorly (i.e.
with the opening overlying the flight membranes or patagia).
In species where the antebrachial membrane is wide, two small
incisions may be made through the membrane just anterior and
posterior to the forearm, allowing the bands to surround the
forearm without affecting the shape and position of the membranes.
In general, bands must be sized to allow for continued growth,
but not so large as to slide over wrist or elbow joints and
hinder movement (Barclay & Bell, 1988).
Bead-clasp and plastic ratchet style necklaces have been used
successfully to mark bats (Barclay & Bell, 1988). Investigators
must exercise extreme care in fitting bats with necklaces,
as an improper fit can lead to open wounds and infection (Barclay
& Bell, 1988). Additionally, necklaces should not be used
on growing juveniles or species with sternal, gular or shoulder
scent glands (Barclay & Bell, 1988).
7.
Tissue Marking
Ear or toe clipping and notching are not acceptable methods
for marking bats. Alterations to the ears can affect their
important role in orientation and locating prey, while changes
to the toes can hamper the bat’s ability to roost or
groom itself (Barclay & Bell, 1988).
Wing membranes of bats have been marked with tattoos for short-term
studies (Barclay & Bell, 1988). Care must be taken, however,
to avoid causing any tears in the wing web membrane, as tears
that extend to the margin of the web usually will not heal
and result in a non-releasable bat.
8. Radio Transmitters
The use of transmitters should be carefully considered, especially
at times when prey are not abundant, given that they may affect
the bat’s maneuverability and foraging habits. Aldridge
and Brigham (1988) found an inverse relation between increased
mass of a bat (such as from the attachment of a radio transmitter)
and the bat’s ability to maneuver. They further suggest
that a decrease in maneuverability is likely to result in
bats choosing open sites over cluttered sites for foraging
(Aldridge & Brigham, 1988). A study by Hickey (1992) indicated
no significant impact on the foraging success of bats in open
areas when transmitters of approximately 3% of the body mass
of the bat are used, but the author acknowledged that this
may differ for bats in cluttered habitats. Aldridge and Brigham
(1988) recommend that radio-telemetry studies be only conducted
when prey is abundant and the animal can maintain a positive
energy balance. When possible, bats should be recaptured to
remove the transmitters once the required data is collected.
Transmitters and other tags should be as small as possible
and not exceed 5% of the bat’s body mass. This means
that a 0.47g transmitter (the smallest available in 2002)
can be attached to a bat weighing 10g, provided that the attachment
mechanism does not add more than an additional 0.03g to the
package.
There are two options for attaching radio transmitters to
bats. The first option is to attach the transmitter to the
interscapular region using a surgical adhesive. Depending
on the care taken in attaching these packages and the grooming
habits of the bat, the packages will remain in place for days
to months (Wilkinson & Bradbury, 1988). This method works
best if the fur is clipped with fine scissors first; however,
if the skin is nicked by accident, the radio tag must not
be attached. Additionally, repeatedly attaching radios to
the same bat may cause permanent reduction in the thickness
of the pelage (Wilkinson & Bradbury, 1988). The second
option is to attach the transmitter by the use of a collar
(e.g., Fenton et al., 1998).
9. Medical / Surgical Procedures
In bats, blood can be obtained from: 1) venous puncture of
the vein running along the anterior edge of the propatagium
or antebrachial membrane; and 2) venous puncture of the major
vein in the interfemoral membrane (Kunz & Kurta, 1988;
Watt & Fenton, 1995). When blood samples greater than
30µL are required, it may be advantageous to do the
blood letting over both of these sites in order to obtain
the necessary sample and to avoid multiple punctures on the
same vein. Researchers should ensure that bleeding has stopped
after drawing blood and before releasing the bat.
Tissue sampling for DNA analysis can be achieved via a small
wing punch using a biopsy punch. This heals quickly. The biopsy
should avoid major blood vessels in the wing and again any
bleeding should have stopped before the bat is released. Procedures
for wing punches are well described by Rossiter et al. (1999;
2000), Kerth et al. (2001) and DeFanis and Jones (1996).
10. Transportation
When intending to transport bats, they should be captured
soon after they have fed and taken water (Kunz & Kurta,
1998), and then moved during the day. The bats should be protected
from temperature extremes, overcrowding and other forms of
stress, and should be provided with fresh food as required.
Kunz and Kurta (1998) note that when bats are removed from
their natural environment, they are prone to becoming dehydrated
and overheated, thus care should be taken to guard against
these conditions. Some bats roost solitarily in the open in
nature while others are extremely gregarious and roost in
tight crevaces. The number of bats held together and the choice
of cages or bags should reflect their natural roosting behavior.
Colonial bats readily accept being held in groups of 5 to
10, while solitary bats should be held separately.
In general, holding containers for bats should be darkened
and well ventilated, and should contain perching structures.
A number of devices have been used successfully for this purpose,
including nylon mesh or muslin bags, the Myers bag, metal
or plastic minnow buckets, and modified plastic trash containers
(see Kunz & Kurta, 1988 for descriptions of these containers).
Barnard (1995) provides a number of designs for containers
to transport bats which take into account the size and habits
of the bat. Suitable designs for containers are also given
in the International Air Transport Association (IATA) Live
Animal Regulations. For short periods of time, a simple cloth
bag may be the best holding container to transport bats, with
the exception of Lasiurus borealis. This species can become
seriously injured in such containers (Constantine, 1986).
The best method for transporting L. borealis is in a styrofoam
container (Barnard, 1995).
Bats that are normally geographically separated should not
be housed together in cages because of the potential risk
of disease transmission (Constantine, 1988). Additionally,
disposable cages, or cages that have been autoclaved or fumigated
between uses, should be used to further prevent the accidental
transmission of diseases (Constantine, 1988).
Investigators should always be mindful of the risk of rabies
transmission when moving bats.
11. Husbandry
Because of the variation among species of bats, literature
on the particular species to be kept in captivity should be
reviewed. Barnard (1995) and Wilson (1988), two such sources
of information, discuss the nutritional requirements for various
groups of bats and how these might be met in captivity, as
well as important considerations for housing.
12. Translocation and Release
Where possible, bats should be released into their original
habitat to avoid unnecessary expenditures of energy in meeting
their needs or in attempting to return to their former habitat
(Barnard, 1995). Barnard (1995) recommends that prior to the
release of a bat, particularly in the spring and fall, it
should be fed for a few days to one week in order to build
sufficient fat reserves for survival.
Care should be taken to avoid releasing bats during the daytime,
as they can be very susceptible to raptor predation. Weather
conditions should also be considered prior to release. Following
the release of a bat, it is necessary to visit the release
site the next morning to determine if the bat has gone; if
the bat has not left, it should be recaptured and released
again at dusk (Barnard, 1995).
13. Euthanasia
For small bats (<30g), cervical dislocation and inhalant
anesthetics are the preferred methods; whereas for larger
bats, only an overdose of inhalant anesthetics should be used.
14. Human Safety Considerations
Rabies pose a risk to those handling bats. Investigators must
be immunized against rabies and ensure that they have a protective
response determined by antibody titre prior to handling any
bats.
Histoplasmosis can also pose a health threat when researchers
must either enter or open confined roosts and generate airborne
particles. For the prevention of histoplasmosis, investigators
should wear a mask to filter the air they breathe or have
a self-contained air supply when entering potentially contaminated
bat roosts (Constantine, 1988). Histoplasmosis is not a health
problem when bats are captured and handled outside roosts.
As a further precaution for the protection of both investigators
and other bat colonies against the spread of diseases, all
clothing, boots and equipment should be decontaminated following
a visit to a bat roost (Constantine, 1988).
15. References
Aldridge H.D.J.N. & Brigham R.M. (1988) Load carrying
and maneuverability in an insectivorous bat: A test of the
5% “rule” of radio-telemetry. Journal of Mammology
69(2):379-382.
Barclay R.M. & Bell G.P. (1988) Marking and observational
techniques. In: Ecological and Behavioral Methods for the
Study of Bats (ed. T.H. Kunz), pp. 59-76. Washington DC: Smithsonian
Institution Press.
Barnard S.M. (1989) The use of microchip implants for identifying
big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus). Animal Keeper's Forum 16(2):50-52.
Barnard S.M. (1995) Bats in Captivity. Basically Bats Wildlife
Conservation Society. Electronic document, http://www.basicallybats.org/onlinebook/cover.htm
Constantine D. (1986) Introduction. In: Zoo and Wild Animal
Medicine (ed. M.E. Fowler), pp. 650-655. Philadelphia PA:
W.B. Saunders Company.
Constantine D. (1988) Health precautions for bat researchers.
In: Ecological and Behavioral Methods for the Study of Bats
(ed. T.H. Kunz), pp. 491-528. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution.
De Fanis E. & Jones G. (1996) Allomaternal care and recognition
between mothers and young in pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus
pipistrellus). Journal of Zoology, London 240:781-787.
Fenton M.B., Rautenbach I.L., Rydell J., Arita H.W., Ortega
J., Bouchard S., Hovorka, M.D., Lim B.K., Odgren E., Portfors-Yeomans
C.V., Scully W., Syme D.M. & Vonhof M.J. (1998) Emergence,
echolocation, diet and foraging of Molossus ater. Biotropica
30:314-320.
Hickey M.B. (1992) Effect of radiotransmitters on the attack
success of Hoary bats, Lasiurus cinereus. Journal of Mammology
73(2):344-346.
Hutson A. M., Mickleburgh S. P. & Racey P. A. (2001) Global
Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, Microchiropteran
bats. 258pp. Gland CH: IUCN.
Kemmerer D.W. (in preparation) Chemical restraint and anesthesia
of heterothermic bats. In: Bats in Captivity (ed. S.M. Barnard),
2nd ed. Malabar FL: Krieger Publishing Company.
Kerth G., Wagner M. & König B. (2001) Roosting together,
foraging apart: information transfer about food is unlikely
to explain sociality in female Bechstein’s bats. Behavioral
Ecology and Sociobiology 50:283-291.
Kunz T.H. & Kurta A. (1988) Capture methods and holding
devices. In: Ecological and Behavioral Methods for the Study
of Bats (ed. T.H. Kunz), pp. 1-29. Washington DC: Smithsonian
Institution.
Rossiter S.J., Burland T.M., Jones G. & Barratt E. M.
(1999) Characterization of microsatellite loci in the greater
horseshoe bat Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. Molecular Ecology
8:1959-1961.
Rossiter S.J., Jones G., Ransome R.D. & Barratt E.M. (2000)
Genetic variation and population structure in the endangered
greater horseshoe bat Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. Molecular
Ecology 9:1131-1135.
Thomas D.W. (1995) Hibernating bats are sensitive to nontactile
human disturbance. Journal of Mammology 76(3):940-946.
Tuttle M.D. (1974) An improved trap for bats. Journal of Mammalogy
55:475-477.
Watt M.E. & Fenton M.B. (1995) DNA fingerprinting provides
evidence of discriminate suckling and non-random mating in
little brown bats, Myotis lucifugus. Molecular Ecology 4:261-264.
Wilkinson G.S. & Bradbury J.W. (1988) Radiotelemetry:
techniques and analysis. In: Ecological and Behavioral Methods
for the Study of Bats (ed. T.H. Kunz), pp. 105-124. Washington
DC: Smithsonian Institution.
Wilson D.E. (1988) Maintaining captive bats. In: Ecological
and Behavioral Methods for the Study of Bats (ed. T.H. Kunz),
pp. 247-263. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution.
Other Useful References
Jackson A.C. & Fenton M.B. (2001) Human rabies and bat
bites. Lancet 357:1714.
McColl K. A., Tordo N. & Aguilar Setién A. (2000)
Bat lyssavirus infections. Scientific and Technical Review
19:177-196. Office International Épizooties.
Nadin-Davis S.A., Huang W., Armstrong J., Casey G.A., Bahloul
C., Tordo N. & Wandeler A.I. (2001) Antigenic and genetic
divergence of rabies viruses from bat species indigenous to
Canada. Virus Research 74:139-156.
Turgeon N., Tucci M., Teitelbaum J., Deshaies D., Pilon P.A.,
Carsley J., Valiquette L., Arruda H., Alain L., Jackson A.C.
& Wandeler A. (2000) Human rabies—Québec,
Canada, 2000. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 49:1115-1116.
[ Back to top ]
|